This is my understanding. Penalties leading to ejections should all be

Sign up, and you'll be able to customize your font size and more! Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Sep 19, 2014
11:46:25am

unctoothman

This is my understanding. Penalties leading to ejections should all be

open to review for consistency.

Report problem with this ad

unctoothman

Bio page: unctoothman
Joined: Mar 15, 2006
Last login: Apr 16, 2024
Total posts: 69,459 (39,998 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

Why wasn't Koroma's Non-Punch reviewed during the game?

dallasbyu

9/19/14 11:42am

Two over turned ejections would have been too embarrassing

JackStack

9/19/14 11:44am

I don't think penalties are reviewable

SoCalCoug

9/19/14 11:44am

except for determining whether there was targeting, apparently

SoCalCoug

9/19/14 11:45am

You're right, they can only review if targeting was called.

fredgarvin

9/19/14 11:45am

there's a specific rule written that targeting gets video review

9/19/14 11:46am

I think any penalty that can result in an ejection should be reviewed

dallasbyu

9/19/14 11:45am

This is my understanding. Penalties leading to ejections should all be

unctoothman

9/19/14 11:46am

hack

unctoothman

9/19/14 11:46am

This might cost us a playoff spot. Stupid refs.

Indy Coug

9/19/14 11:46am

The funny thing is that the ref that threw the flag

dallasbyu

9/19/14 11:48am

Watching the replay it sure looks like he cocks back his

Fdnman

9/19/14 11:50am

No fist was made, no contact was made. No punch possible.

OptimisTIC

9/19/14 12:30pm

it looked like a punch to me. closed fist everything.

bald man

9/19/14 11:56am

No. I believe he the suspension was overturned because he wasn't fighting

SpiffCoug

9/19/14 12:14pm

AGain. There was no punch.

OptimisTIC

9/19/14 12:31pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad