there's a specific rule written that targeting gets video review

Report problem with this ad

Sep 19, 2014
11:46:26am

NanoFab Coug

but I don't believe other ejectable penalties don't have the same provision.

If they do, I've never seen it used.

Report problem with this ad

NanoFab Coug

Previous username: bdoggy
Bio page: NanoFab Coug
Joined: Apr 30, 2007
Last login: Apr 24, 2024
Total posts: 35,634 (5,552 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

Why wasn't Koroma's Non-Punch reviewed during the game?

dallasbyu

9/19/14 11:42am

Two over turned ejections would have been too embarrassing

JackStack

9/19/14 11:44am

I don't think penalties are reviewable

SoCalCoug

9/19/14 11:44am

except for determining whether there was targeting, apparently

SoCalCoug

9/19/14 11:45am

You're right, they can only review if targeting was called.

fredgarvin

9/19/14 11:45am

there's a specific rule written that targeting gets video review

NanoFab Coug

9/19/14 11:46am

I think any penalty that can result in an ejection should be reviewed

dallasbyu

9/19/14 11:45am

This is my understanding. Penalties leading to ejections should all be

unctoothman

9/19/14 11:46am

hack

unctoothman

9/19/14 11:46am

This might cost us a playoff spot. Stupid refs.

Indy Coug

9/19/14 11:46am

The funny thing is that the ref that threw the flag

dallasbyu

9/19/14 11:48am

Watching the replay it sure looks like he cocks back his

Fdnman

9/19/14 11:50am

No fist was made, no contact was made. No punch possible.

OptimisTIC

9/19/14 12:30pm

it looked like a punch to me. closed fist everything.

bald man

9/19/14 11:56am

No. I believe he the suspension was overturned because he wasn't fighting

SpiffCoug

9/19/14 12:14pm

AGain. There was no punch.

Posting on CougarBoard