doesn't mean I'm OK with it.

Most of the posts I've seen "supporting" Bronco, are posters who are trying just to support their team or who are responding to the irrational comments by his detractors. If the over the top rhetoric died down, I'll bet you'd see more posters expressing some of their concerns.

Not everyone feels that verbal diarhea shows that you are a true fan. "Bronco has a crush on Nick Howell and wants to be a Mission President." Really? "Don't tell me what kind of fan to be." Right back at ya.

Just because I choose not to focus on every possible negative about the program doesn't make me a bad fan or an endorser of "mediocrity". Those who choose to only see the positives aren't bad fans either.

You think Bronco should move on. Some think he's the right man for the job. Others think he's the only man for the job. The main difference I've seen between the three groups is that the first one is awful to be around and listen to for most people.

My personal opinion is that Bronco is capable of getting BYU to the "next level". If things continue for the next few years like they have for the last few, I'm sure Bronco will move on of his own choice, if not, he will be moved on.

I certainly don't think he is the only man for the BYU job, but I understand why some may feel that he is the only one right now. I don't understand the perspective of people who are advocates of "firing" him, and don't really respect the manner in which many express that opinion.