highpoint of the catch isn't a catch. he has to come down before it's a catch.

Nov 23, 2014
9:59:43pm

macaroni

but even if it was at the high point, at no point did he come to the 30. they had the camera right on the line the entire time, fortunately. it was clear.

Report problem with this ad

macaroni

Bio page: macaroni
Joined: Feb 18, 2007
Last login: Feb 3, 2020
Total posts: 35,674 (12,962 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

They could conclusively determine it was short? If Bryant's TD catch was

ocmyhome

11/23/14 9:50pm

Nah, that was easily short. I didn't watch the Bryant replay but the 2 aren't

Walter Bellhaven

11/23/14 9:51pm

It was clear he never crossed the 30, easy call.

Duke Silver

11/23/14 9:51pm

Even at the high point of the catch? IMO not conclusive at all... Sure, it

ocmyhome

11/23/14 9:53pm

That doesn't matter because the player brought the ball back behind the 30

Walter Bellhaven

11/23/14 9:54pm

highpoint of the catch isn't a catch. he has to come down before it's a catch.

macaroni

11/23/14 9:59pm

I think it's marked at where it's caught, and the players feet being in is only

ocmyhome

11/23/14 10:15pm

You're missing the point though. He very well could've crossed the 30

Walter Bellhaven

11/23/14 10:22pm

I understood that point, I don't think that's how they mark it, especially

ocmyhome

11/23/14 10:36pm

That is in fact how it is marked.

Walter Bellhaven

11/23/14 10:38pm

it's where he comes down. They said it during the broadcast

macaroni

11/24/14 6:50am

I did not think he made it but I did not think video was conclusive

Posting on CougarBoard