Mar 3, 2015
2:44:33pm
2:44:33pm
i'm not...i addressed the only think BigD brought up that was actually
comparable with #'s.
unless you want to quantify things like "more durable" and "better passer". those are very intangible things that can only partly, if at all, be explained via stats (assists, games played, etc).
claiming stockton had a "better shooting %" is patently false. i was simply disproving him of that notion.
unless you want to quantify things like "more durable" and "better passer". those are very intangible things that can only partly, if at all, be explained via stats (assists, games played, etc).
claiming stockton had a "better shooting %" is patently false. i was simply disproving him of that notion.
- Bio page
- nashty
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2008
- Last login
- Sep 4, 2018
- Total posts
- 50,804 (10,391 FO)
