report and tampering of evidence is a lot higher than the actual .01% of cases where it happens.

I get that the media likes to focus on the .01% and that's why ignorant people believe the police are all corrupt.

But CB is supposed to be more enlightened.

Right?

I've seen it a lot on here. Especially with the Charles West case.

Do a lot of you really think cops just have no checks and balances in place to try and ensure it doesn't happen?

That they can just do whatever they want?

That they are frequently lying or tampering in order to convict someone of a crime that they didn't do?

Why would they do that? Why would they risk their careers and reputation to do that?

Especially on some no name person for a somewhat non major crime...

I'm not saying it doesn't happen guys. It does. Police aren't perfect. But if you look at the actually stats....it's very very rare.

Is Cougarboard just full of defense attorneys or what? Lol