That won't last long

Sign up, and you can make all message times appear in your timezone. Sign up

Report problem with this ad

May 4, 2015
8:30:26am

panguitch

That won't last long

Riding on program prestige rather than paying athletes won't last long. All it takes is one program with equivalent or greater prestige to also pay, and then you have to match the move.

Coaches can be bought. Players can be bought. And why not? Professors can be bought too.

This message has been modified

Originally posted on May 4, 2015 at 8:30:26am

Message modified by panguitch on May 4, 2015 at 8:31:19am

Report problem with this ad

panguitch

Bio page: panguitch
Joined: Aug 22, 2014
Last login: Oct 2, 2023
Total posts: 2,929 (1 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

There seems to be a correlation to paying less and having a perceived better

SouthernBlueBlood

5/4/15 7:42am

USC scholarship is worth something like $67,000, and probably already has

Kajdin

5/4/15 7:55am

The value of the scholarship will matter very little to most athletes

LifeLongLakerFan

5/4/15 8:04am

that's what I was thinking as well

SouthernBlueBlood

5/4/15 8:07am

Cash that USC already paid in their scholarship. Stipends weren't illegal.

Kajdin

5/4/15 8:08am

So they are evaluating based on overall costs- so would I be correct in assuming

SouthernBlueBlood

5/4/15 8:07am

There should be zero correlation between athletics and the COA.

Josef K

5/4/15 8:30am

Some of it is transportation costs

mogelijk

5/4/15 9:06am

That won't last long

panguitch

5/4/15 8:30am

Meh, Tennessee is highest, followed by Auburn

jkccoug

5/4/15 10:43am

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad