We did lose the all time leading scorer & replaced him with a bunch of unknowns.

Sign up, and you can make all message times appear in your timezone. Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Aug 27, 2015
7:04:50pm

WhyKnot

We did lose the all time leading scorer & replaced him with a bunch of unknowns.

Report problem with this ad

WhyKnot

Previous username: Jonce17
New username: Ocho Cuatro
Bio page: WhyKnot
Joined: May 14, 2011
Last login: Jul 2, 2017
Total posts: 0 (0 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

Does anyone think we won't be better this year than last year?

fredetteaboutit13

8/27/15 6:51pm

I think we just keep getting better the next 3 years.

93 cougar

8/27/15 6:54pm

We did lose the all time leading scorer & replaced him with a bunch of unknowns.

WhyKnot

8/27/15 7:04pm

So you don't think we will be better?

fredetteaboutit13

8/27/15 7:11pm

Hope so, too many questions.

WhyKnot

8/27/15 8:06pm

Scoring is never an issue for BYU.

southernfriedcougar

8/27/15 8:09pm

I think our front court will be much better but our guard play will be more

downtownchrisbrown

8/27/15 7:24pm

We had zero offensive post presence last year. We'll be better this year.

SingleStrapBackpack

8/27/15 7:24pm

I think we will be, emphasize on D, presence of post...l

Y4LYFE

8/27/15 7:33pm

Will we be better this year? Probably. Will our record reflect it? Probably not.

kalifi

8/27/15 7:37pm

No Haws will be hard to predict, I think. As will losing Winder & Bartley's D.

mantis mutu

8/27/15 7:50pm

I actually think the loss of Haws is a much easier loss for

southernfriedcougar

8/27/15 8:19pm

More balance, more threes, more rebounds, more wins...easier schedule, too

ag4cougs

8/27/15 8:09pm

Better.

BDAWG

8/27/15 8:45pm

Loss of Haws ~ Loss of Jimmer

LeonMarek

8/27/15 8:45pm

Jimmer was a more versatile, dangerous player than Haws, though.

mantis mutu

8/27/15 9:19pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad