of course it is a part of the story because they lost. My point is that if

Sign up, and you'll be able to customize your font size and more! Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Sep 4, 2015
8:05:42am

BYUheaven

of course it is a part of the story because they lost. My point is that if

Michigan had won by 2 points we would be talking about personal fouls and missed field goals today instead of a bad qb. To say that if Michigan had a better qb they would have won is kind of a blanket statement. We can change the score of any football game by switching the outcome of two or three plays for either team.

Report problem with this ad

BYUheaven

Bio page: BYUheaven
Joined: Jan 5, 2011
Last login: Apr 24, 2024
Total posts: 37,981 (4,971 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

Utes look about the same as last year. Good but not great. Should have a

Singcat

9/4/15 7:45am

Secondary seems worse, passing game better, special teams worse

viper

9/4/15 7:54am

Playing the better QB game is kind of dumb. I could make the same case that

BYUheaven

9/4/15 7:55am

Michigan's bad QB play is a big part of the story - and even more

smokymountainrain

9/4/15 8:01am

of course it is a part of the story because they lost. My point is that if

BYUheaven

9/4/15 8:05am

I think I agree with your overall point, but once again disgree

smokymountainrain

9/4/15 8:12am

Agreed. I think MI was actually better. If you

9/4/15 8:09am

The lack of pass rush is what I'd be most concerned about

whoneedscorners?

9/4/15 8:30am

Donco?

9/4/15 8:31am

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad