how is simultaneous possession defined? did the NFL come out and say that

Oct 6, 2015
1:24:23pm

BertoChavez

if one player looks like they have more control that simultaneous possession doesn't apply?

I'm not a Seattle fan, but I'm not sure how it wasn't simultaneous possession just because one player had it closer to his body.

Report problem with this ad

BertoChavez

New username: Pedant
Bio page: BertoChavez
Joined: Feb 1, 2012
Last login: Jan 15, 2020
Total posts: 0 (0 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

The bottom line is, refs make mistakes. You win some and you lose some

Sea Chicken

10/6/15 1:00pm

unless you're seattle, then you always win...

1984coug

10/6/15 1:03pm

You forgot to mention last year's super bowl. Wait, they lost.

Dr taylore90

10/6/15 1:09pm

They lost a Super Bowl on calls so bad that the ref later apologized

wabluecoug

10/6/15 1:23pm

how is simultaneous possession defined? did the NFL come out and say that

BertoChavez

10/6/15 1:24pm

Imagine Seahawk fans if the roles had been reversed last night...

RichieRich

10/6/15 1:06pm

They'd all go back to their original teams

1984coug

10/6/15 1:06pm

I'd say, well that sucks.

Twin Roots

10/6/15 1:22pm

That play had no effect on the game? Seriously?

RichieRich

10/6/15 1:23pm

None whatsoever

Twin Roots

10/6/15 3:16pm

That's not the point. Stupid rule or not, it's a rule and thus a blown no call.

RichieRich

10/6/15 3:29pm

i heard the UCONN guy DID kick it in the stands. in the stadium

fattycoug

10/6/15 4:23pm

Seemed like a little kick that landed in one of the first few rows.

BertoChavez

10/6/15 4:32pm

BM Super Bowl XL - refs are still trying to make up for that.

Posting on CougarBoard