My Account
Sign up, and CougarBoard will remember which categories you want to view.
Sign up
Report problem with this ad
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Nov 27, 2015
11:47
:21
am
HuskerFan2
Former User
A 65 inch TV is 17% bigger than a 60 inch TV
1538 square inches vs 1805 square inches
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Report problem with this ad
HuskerFan2
Bio page
HuskerFan2
Joined
Jul 17, 2002
Last login
Apr 23, 2024
Total posts
52,356 (3,176 FO)
Report problem with this ad
Messages
Author
Time
One more time. Sorry. Would you rather get a
Bravescoug
11/27/15 11:33am
65"
Kerbouchard
11/27/15 11:34am
Go big or go home.
Cylon Coug
11/27/15 11:35am
If $180 doesn't break your budget go bigger.
srey
11/27/15 11:37am
65 without question
Pasadena
11/27/15 11:38am
I agree with the previous four responses. If you have the $180, get the bigger
Tim
11/27/15 11:38am
TV's, rims and burritos. Always get a bigger size than you think
BlueFrog
11/27/15 11:41am
a 65" tv has 17.4% more screen area than a 60" tv
DapperDan
11/27/15 11:43am
A 65 inch TV is 17% bigger than a 60 inch TV
HuskerFan2
11/27/15 11:47am
You'll regret it if you don't get the bigger one
KingDave
11/27/15 11:48am
Thanks everyone. Pulled the trigger on the 65".
Bravescoug
11/27/15 11:53am
We never outgrow peer pressure, but you made the right choice
4mack
11/27/15 11:55am
You won't regret it. 5" is significant, and well worth another $180 imo.
Kerbouchard
11/27/15 11:58am
That being said...my 70 inch is sweet.
Fdnman
11/27/15 12:50pm
Report problem with this ad
Posting on CougarBoard
In order to post, you will need to either
sign up
or
log in
.
Report problem with this ad