Sign up, and you can customize which countdowns you see. Sign up
Feb 9, 2016
5:42:39pm
Cougarrrs Walk-on
I disagree with the "ceiling" idea.
First, we give lavell credit for using ingenuity to make up for lack of talent (rightly so). His winning percentage was 68%. Meanwhile Bronco was able to hit that mark without the previously mentioned ingenuity. So Bronco had the talent level but not the ingenuity? Which leads me to:

Second, there are many variables that can effect a stat so broad as winning percentage. It boils down to at least three major components: coaching ability, recruiting, and schedule. Each of these have a massive subset of contributing factors, but overall these are the big contributors.

All that needs to happen is an increase/decrease in one area. But for there to be a ceiling these factors must be either inversely proportional or maxed out. I don't think our coaching ability is maxed out. Bronco wasnt the highest of the high that we can attract. I don't think our recruiting is maxed out, in fact I think our recruiting is going to improve drastically. Scheduling is obviously fluid since we are independent and scheduling is (at least somewhat) inversely proportional to both of the other factors.
Cougarrrs
Bio page
Cougarrrs
Joined
Sep 29, 2014
Last login
Oct 25, 2016
Total posts
6,307 (16 FO)