My Account
Sign up, and you'll be able to customize your font size and more!
Sign up
Report problem with this ad
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Feb 10, 2016
6:13
:27
pm
thebruce
Contributor
It isn't about individual players
It is about what groups are struggling as a whole....be which ones do well together. Nothing earth shattering but still good info to have.
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Report problem with this ad
thebruce
New username
JoeExotic
Bio page
thebruce
Joined
Jul 19, 2014
Last login
Mar 27, 2020
Total posts
0 (0 FO)
Report problem with this ad
Messages
Author
Time
interesting Plus/Minus stats on various lineups Coach Rose has used...
icecougar
2/10/16 5:36pm
GREAT!!!! The worst is the starting 5.
coug10278
2/10/16 5:41pm
Not the starting lineup anymore
BYUheaven
2/10/16 5:53pm
I missed the beginning of the Pacific game...who's the new starter(s)?
coug10278
2/10/16 6:57pm
KC, Emery, Fischer, Hartsock, Davis in the last two games
BYUheaven
2/10/16 7:42pm
Wow, time flies. Actually last two games I missed beginning
coug10278
2/10/16 8:07pm
Nice write up.
HighHorse
2/10/16 5:54pm
This would lead me to believe that Chatman is 31 pts better than Emery.
SpiffCoug
2/10/16 6:05pm
It isn't about individual players
thebruce
2/10/16 6:13pm
I think it also sheds some light on how difficult it's been for Rose to find...
icecougar
2/10/16 6:33pm
Not valid per Pomeroy's conclusions from his treatise on plus/minus:
roseyscenario
2/10/16 6:41pm
Another indicator
bigkat
2/10/16 6:56pm
Does Pomeroy comment on +/- with lineup groups?
icecougar
2/11/16 3:48pm
I agree 100%. I think Chatman needs to be used more to help any
Coach's Dad
2/10/16 8:33pm
Report problem with this ad
Posting on CougarBoard
In order to post, you will need to either
sign up
or
log in
.
Report problem with this ad