How could you believe that?
- Their statements weren't in the least bit consistent. Heck, they confessed to doing things that didn't happen.
- The DNA evidence proved there was only one man's semen at the crime. And it wasn't any of theirs.
- The one man's who's semen was at the crime confessed. In fact, it was after he confessed that they matched his semen.
- In his confession, he revealed details about the crime that the public didn't know.
How in the heck could you say they are still guilty?