He may actually be good, but sample size (thus far) is not enough to determine he is actually good.

He certainly didn't play bad and that is not what I am inferring, but why take a step backwards in Ty's offensive progression and run the '16 offense again?

Personally, me being "down" on him comes strictly to his playing style vs. what Ty ultimately wants to run. Can Ty be flexible, absolutely. He showed that last year. But he will have two additional years to advance his offense, and then take a step in another direction? I don't like that, given a choice.