ergo, it may have been an unusual call, but it does not qualify as a "bad call." Many with no cheering stake in the game analyzed the infraction and had to admit (objectively) that Jake clearly violated an official rule of the game that carries a designated negative consequence. After review and confirmation, the penalty was assessed and, coincidently, the PAT was blocked. In my opinion, even with the penalty yards, the straight-down-the-pipe PAT should have been a gimme.

The premise of Indy Coug's original question was to discuss bad/good calls that affected the outcome of a BYU game. Good question for BYU fans on a BYU board.

Apparently, we agree that the officiating crew fumbled the Bradley interception call/review late in the 2010 game. With such clear evidence to the contrary, the collective outcome of that obvious miss was, is and will forever remain inexcusable. It was clearly a bad call.

Conceptually, fair-minded people can hold and civilly express differing/contrasting opinions. Why label an "abnormal number" of BYU fans on CougarBoard who may disagree with your opinion of the Locker penalty (and perhaps other cases) as somehow deficient in objectivity?