Menu
Message Board
Board Menu
Cougar Sports
Site
Board
Message Board
Search
Post of the Day
Favorite Posts
Videos
RSS Feeds
Social Media
Cougar Sports
Schedule
Roster
Opponent Boards
Depth Chart
Future Schedules
Store
NCAA Bracket
Site
Events
Donate
FAQ
Ideas
Stats
Rules
Contact Us
About
My Account
Login
Sign Up
Login with Facebook
Login with Twitter
Login with Google+
Report problem with this ad
Reply
Reply in this thread
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
May 24, 2012 - 10:30am
rggee
I don't know if I'd call them "really good"
Maybe "decent" to "good"
Reply
Reply in this thread
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Report problem with this ad
Report problem with this ad
Messages
Author
Date
I see many CB'ers thinking that the 09>>06 in FB. I don't
spugeddy24
May 24, 09:38am
Nope.
(nm)
rggee
May 24, 09:43am
'09 had more quality wins
Doctor Rosenrosen
May 24, 09:48am
And those "quality wins" ended up not so amazing, after all.
(nm)
rggee
May 24, 09:52am
How so?
(nm)
Jericho
May 24, 10:14am
Our only "big wins" were Oklahoma, Utah, and Oregon State.
rggee
May 24, 10:19am
OU was actually a really good team
Jericho
May 24, 10:25am
I don't know if I'd call them "really good"
(short)
rggee
May 24, 10:30am
I think they were legit top 25
Jericho
May 24, 11:13am
5- loss top 25 team? I think not.
(nm)
rggee
May 24, 11:31am
Like I said, when you take into account who they lost to
Jericho
May 24, 11:42am
06 was a much better team.
(nm)
SamoanCoug
May 24, 10:07am
Hard to say, 09 had better wins, 06 had
Jericho
May 24, 10:12am
Posting on CougarBoard
In order to post, you will need to either
sign up
or
log in
.
