You have applied the following logical fallacies:
+ The Texas sharpshooter. Cherry-picking data clusters to suit an argument.
+ Ad hominem. Attacking your opponent's character or personal traits instead of engaging with argument.
+ Strawman. Misrepresenting someone to make him easier to attack.
+ Black or white. Where alternative states are presented as the only possibilities, i.e. that one must be the little brother of the other.
+ Begging the question. A circular argument in which the conclusion is imbedded in the premise.
+ False cause. Presuming that a real or perceived relationship between things means that one is the cause of the other.
+ Bandwagon. Appealing to popularity or the fact that many people do something as an attempted form of validation.
+ Appeal to authority. Using the opinion or position of an authority figure, or institution of authority, in place of an actual argument.
+ Tu quoque. Avoiding having to engage with criticism by turning it back on the accuser.
This offseason is dreadful. Graham Watson makes a troll post to stir up views among her readers and people go crazy. IF Whitt even said it the way she said it, the point wasn't really about surpassing the rivalry as much as it was about the fact that Utah's success criteria have changed to render the game less important, even unnecessary. If shoes were switched it would be exactly the same thing. Personally I hope BYU finds a way out of its self-imposed exile. Parallel success for both schools is best for the state and people of Utah. What we've had/have is not.