So if you read the article I posted, then you would know the author addressed your claim that the theory has been disproved over and over again as you like to point out. He offers up the numerous studies pro-vaxxers like to cite and then offers rebuttals. What are your responses to his rebuttals?

I know this is not new to a lot of you. But I also think the vast majority of people do not read the actual scientific articles to see what they conclude. I also think a vast majority of people hear people they trust say "its been disproven over and over and over" and they believe it. They are definitely red flags out there. I'm not arguing that vaccines are bad. I think they are essential for general populations. I just also believe that there might be things in them that cause issues for a unique subset of people. Many of the studies prove things that aren't exactly answering the question. What about the CDC whistleblower, an author on a few of those CDC studies, that said that they falsified information? What if that's true?