his extensive attacks at the integrity of everyone involved while mimicking all the activities he argues against.

I haven't read all the articles, but as a science and stats nerd sleeping with a neuroscientist, I've read a fair number of them and understand the methods/analysis if not the actual science.

The truth is this: The science neither proves nor dis-proves a connection between our current vaccination schedule and autism. That is true. It can also be said like this: "There is no proof that vaccinations cause autism and there is no definitive proof there is not a connection"

However, he is saying: the absence of proof to the contrary is proof the connection is real.

Just like the sasquatch people. You can't prove them wrong because you have no proof sasquatch doesn't exist.

He is disingenuous in failing to state that the incidence of disabling deficits due to the diseases vaccinated for (20 vaccinations in 1 year) has plummeted precipitously since the introduction of vaccines. He makes it seem like this is a simple (no vaccine no risk vs vaccine and risk of autism) question.

I could go on about his fallacies and two-faced approach to interpreting science but I'll leave it with one final shot.

He decries anyone who took money from Pharma/Vax companies yet he himself works for/worked for a foundation dedicated to spreading the philosophy he now espouses. Pot, this is the Kettle....

That said, I'm happy to discuss his approach with you anytime.