My point was that while both coaches have underperformed in the past few years, I view Rose's performance as worse due to the fact that he coaches in a conference where he has greater resources than any other coach with the exception of Gonzaga, yet he still has his job while the other was fired.

But given prior posts it seems like you love labeling people Rose haters thinking we wish him harm because we feel he isn't doing as good of a job as should be expected. For me it doesn't matter if I like him or not. For me the only thing that matters is the product vs where the product should be. Forgive me for not thinking that annual losses to really bad teams like Portland, UVU, Long Beach State, Pepperdine, San Diego, and Pacific are acceptable. If I have an employee who doesn't perform up to expectations I have to take action whether I like him or not.