Apr 10, 2020
11:24:33am
11:24:33am
That not what the article said. The article, of course, has now been scrubbed from the internet once UCSF realized
people were pushing it as a USCF sanctioned event. It wasn't. Turns out so much of it was taken out of context and extrapolated. But it was widely shared and accepted. Including by many here on CB. Because "experts" were involved.
Conclusions from the article: 40-70% of Americans would get it no matter what. >1.5million Americans would die. Social distancing would simply slow it down. 1.5million would still die no matter what.
Conclusions from the article: 40-70% of Americans would get it no matter what. >1.5million Americans would die. Social distancing would simply slow it down. 1.5million would still die no matter what.
Originally posted on Apr 10, 2020 at 11:24:33am
Message modified by YIsForBrigham on Apr 10, 2020 at 11:24:59am
- Previous username
- TrueAndBlue
- Bio page
- YIsForBrigham
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2012
- Last login
- Apr 18, 2024
- Total posts
- 65,279 (17,722 FO)
Messages
Time
That article about the UCSF "expert" panel people peddled on here a few weeks ago predicted 1.5 million US deaths from
4/10/20 11:16am
What were the underlying assumptions made then regarding mitigation and have those assumptions materialized
4/10/20 11:18am
4/10/20 11:21am
4/10/20 11:21am
That not what the article said. The article, of course, has now been scrubbed from the internet once UCSF realized
4/10/20 11:24am
4/10/20 11:29am
4/10/20 11:29am
4/10/20 11:45am
4/10/20 12:08pm
4/10/20 12:16pm
4/10/20 12:02pm