The one called was phantom. The other would have been legit

Sign up, and you can customize which countdowns you see. Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Oct 18, 2020
12:20:58am

BYU '80 Intervention Needed

The one called was phantom. The other would have been legit

Report problem with this ad

BYU '80

Bio page: BYU '80
Joined: Jan 11, 2006
Last login: Apr 19, 2024
Total posts: 49,711 (123 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

Am I the only one that thinks this makes BYU fans extremely blue Googled?

cougaman

10/17/20 11:27pm

I was fine with the targeting call on Harper. However,

Ungoy

10/17/20 11:39pm

And it took refs Foreeever to make the call.

Soupie

10/17/20 11:42pm

The officiating added about an hour to the game with their terrible pace and

wabluecoug

10/17/20 11:43pm

Maybe. Based on what rule though? Targeting?! No. It was unsportsmanlike

cougaman

10/17/20 11:44pm

He launched, he lead with the crown and made forceful contact to the head. He

wabluecoug

10/17/20 11:47pm

And they also could have thrown a flag on Harper for taunting him.

cougaman

10/17/20 11:50pm

You've gone too far...they dont call that anymore they let everyone stare down

coug10278

10/18/20 8:31am

<< Deleted >>

10/17/20 11:55pm

#2 or #4 could have merited an ejection

Cougarrr

10/17/20 11:47pm

Those would be a real stretch imo. He just got in Harpers face. He deserved the

cougaman

10/17/20 11:53pm

Uh, he head butted him.

rggee

10/17/20 11:58pm

do you think that act warranted an ejecting for "fighting", "flagrant personal

cougaman

10/18/20 12:04am

Flagrant personal foul absolutely. One could argue fighting.

rggee

10/18/20 12:06am

Considering that Harper got up and taunted him, I didn't feel he warranted an

cougaman

10/18/20 12:10am

The biggest thing is they ejected Harper for something incidental and let the

wabluecoug

10/17/20 11:42pm

They are bound by stupid rules. What would they eject the other player for?

cougaman

10/17/20 11:45pm

What he did was technically targeting, and you can eject players for things like

wabluecoug

10/17/20 11:48pm

Yep. Posted rules above. Could have qualified as ejection 2 different ways.

Cougarrr

10/17/20 11:49pm

So you think he should have been ejected for targeting? You think he "launched"

cougaman

10/17/20 11:57pm

What he did is little different than taking your helmet off and hitting someone

Ungoy

10/18/20 12:10am

The difference in speed and danger to the opposing player is quite significant.

cougaman

10/18/20 12:11am

Not much different than a punch.

BYU '80

10/18/20 12:20am

I think it's more like a push than a punch. Just my opinion though

cougaman

10/18/20 12:24am

The helmet is a weapon and he used it as one. Just like targeting. Fights get started with stuff like that

BYU '80

10/18/20 12:27am

Do you honestly think that the Houston player used his helmet as a weapon and

cougaman

10/18/20 1:40am

There were two block in the backs that I saw on the Allgeier screen pass.

LyleLanley

10/18/20 12:17am

The one called was phantom. The other would have been legit

BYU '80

10/18/20 12:20am

Which was phantom? The OL didn't actually push him, but the penalty was enforced

cougaman

10/18/20 12:23am

Maybe so. Refs didn’t announce the number and I didn’t know from where they enforced it.

BYU '80

10/18/20 12:26am

It was. I watched a few times to check.

cougaman

10/18/20 12:28am

Homers? No kidding Sherlock! You’re on a BYU fan board.

10/18/20 3:38am

Pau'u clear as day had a knee down with the ball in possession

HONOMO

10/18/20 9:03am

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad