Depends on what we call "better"

Jun 11, 2021
12:07:55pm

TheWanderer Royalist

PAC-12 is more likely to produce a team that can win a national title.

AAC probably has more depth.

And in CFB, being better does not matter. It's all about who your friends were back in 1970.

Report problem with this ad

TheWanderer

Bio page: TheWanderer
Joined: Mar 18, 2016
Last login: Apr 24, 2024
Total posts: 11,064 (1,416 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

POLL: Based purely on the quality of their teams, which conference is better?

BlueVU

6/11/21 12:04pm

Pac-12, but the AAC's top 5 is probably not far behind the Pac-12's top 5 most

ZacSeljaas'Stache

6/11/21 12:06pm

I think this is the correct answer.

BlueVU

6/11/21 12:07pm

Is there any doubt???

Adrielle

6/11/21 12:06pm

Yes.

Moops

6/11/21 12:09pm

Depends on what we call "better"

TheWanderer

6/11/21 12:07pm

More depth? Definitely not.

Yiowa

6/11/21 12:25pm

Not player depth, team depth.

TheWanderer

6/11/21 12:29pm

All those teams you mentioned are still fairly good teams.

Yiowa

6/11/21 12:40pm

You just have to judge every AAC school by its best team in the past decade

Scratch

6/11/21 12:49pm

Now or once BYU and BSU join the AAC?

Nikomedes

6/11/21 12:17pm

For the record, I voted P12. But I think an argument CAN be made for the AAC.

BlueVU

6/11/21 12:18pm

An argument could be made the McDonald’s is the best restaurant in the world.

TCuz

6/11/21 12:19pm

Quality of teams is directly connected to the quality of players they have

LifelongAP

6/11/21 12:31pm

It’s not really that close IMO. Pac 12 is way better.

Taccoug

6/11/21 12:32pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad