I know we’ve always seen the ESPN partnership as a bonus when dealing with

Jun 13, 2021
9:05:35am

crm48 Pretty...Pretty...Pretty Good

Expansion, but why would ESPN be our advocate to expand into a P5 conference where it results in paying us 5x the amount the pay us now for the same content?

This message has been modified

Originally posted on Jun 13, 2021 at 9:05:35am

Message modified by crm48 on Jun 13, 2021 at 9:06:42am

Report problem with this ad

crm48

Bio page: crm48
Joined: Sep 20, 2008
Last login: Apr 24, 2024
Total posts: 9,879 (90 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

I know we’ve always seen the ESPN partnership as a bonus when dealing with

crm48

6/13/21 9:05am

Better games

All-American

6/13/21 9:06am

If they pay us 5mm more but they earn 50mm more, they’re way ahead.

bruincoug

6/13/21 9:14am

Why would they pay 5x because of a label? The gap between the AAC deal and P12 deal is already the same size as P12 and

molodyets

6/13/21 9:12am

Bc that’s how much P5 schools make.. last I saw we are making $5MM or so from tv revenue.. P5 schools make $20MM

crm48

6/13/21 9:28am

They make a wide range from league to league- getting a P6 stamp wouldn’t magically make their value the

molodyets

6/13/21 11:10am

The OP was talking about expansion of the cartel conferences, no?

AZcougLawyer

6/13/21 1:19pm

Ah misread. Yes

molodyets

6/13/21 1:29pm

Because of two things:

LEDSFW

6/13/21 10:32am

This is laughable; when you say BYU = Texas, Oklahoma, ND you lose credibility

krindorr

6/13/21 2:13pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad