If you haven’t seen it, it’s long, hard to listen to at times but the dudes mostly checkout to be legit.

They have a few big beefs with the vaccine that I’m finding very interesting but hard to corroborate:

1- ivermectin among other existing treatments are safer and more effective than the vaccine but suppressed by the decision to only use the RNA vaccine for whatever of a variety of possible to beyond creative reasons people choose to fill in that blank

2- censure ship of the negative side effects of the vaccine are clear and thwarting the ability to understand the safety of the vaccine. Numerous people erased from FB and others due to telling their story about the negative reactions (how do you back that up?)

3 VARES database shows a hockey stick jump in vaccine deaths as soon as the vaccine goes into use and nobody attempts to address it. USA Today runs a story trying to say that the covid vaccine has a more a open method to report issues explaining the jump which makes no sense because it would negate the use of the purpose of database to track efficiencies of different vaccines and the explanation for the “more open method” leans towards the rush to the public of the vaccine yet somehow reinforced no corners were cut in an effort to have their cake and eat it too

4 if you look for web communities or even online polls to gather and discuss negative effects of the vaccine they are difficult to find or are censured all together

5 Inability doctors to be doctors and treat patients with anything but the vaccine. Going contrary to that would have them ostracized even if they saw contrary evidence

6- women and children should not get the vaccine. The spike protein resulting from vaccine is cytotoxic and gathers in the Uterus and bone marrow with unknown effects. OBGYNs have seen numerous birth defects in babies when the mother was vaccinated but cannot relate the vaccine in their report because “the vaccine is safe”

7 thy cite multiple studies and papers but I didn’t see any posted or linked to it. Some are but I’m not too interested in reading that type of dry literature

8 his idea to save the world is very stupid… that was the dumbest part of the lecture.

I don’t believe all this stuff but What I 100% believe is data on the vaccine and covid in general is being censored, transparency is incredibly poor. I’ve read a lot of the CDC articles and they are weak at best with comments like a Q&A “does the vaccine change your DNA?” I have never heard anything about it changing your DNA I guess I took AP bio and genetics in college so I know the difference between the two. Of course it says no but what they don’t say is tRNA helps build a protein that is not in your blueprints… so it’s like saying “ we didn’t change the blueprints of your house but we’ve going to actually build things a little differently…” who knows maybe those differences are improvements… maybe they are out of code and will cause major issues later… fact is nobody knows yet