defense that the Bills did. The only difference is that the Chiefs' defense wasn't put to the test again in OT.
Yes, the Bills had their chances to win in regulation. But so did the Chiefs. So why were the Chiefs given an advantage in OT based on nothing more than a coin toss? That's the question that cannot be answered with comments like, "Hey, the Bills should have had a better defense" or "They had their chances in the 4th quarter."