I don’t like this option because the PAC members would try to keep us out

Sign up, and CougarBoard will remember which categories you want to view. Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Jul 3, 2022
11:35:23am

runningryan Pretend Athletic Director

I don’t like this option because the PAC members would try to keep us out

Report problem with this ad

runningryan

Bio page: runningryan
Joined: Jan 2, 2014
Last login: Apr 23, 2024
Total posts: 4,694 (6 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

Dennis Dodd of CBS just posted one idea: take the best of the Big 12 and PAC 12

BlooCoog

7/3/22 11:19am

BYU is going to get screwed again

claw

7/3/22 11:27am

My fear as well we need the big 12 to be aggressive right now.

johnnybyu

7/3/22 11:33am

If the decision was simply metrics based then I’d like our chances as we compare

Polemic

7/3/22 11:35am

I share that concern. Big 12 has to be aggressive.

BlooCoog

7/3/22 11:38am

We'll be alright.

rockyrd

7/3/22 12:29pm

Best situation would be...

KU4LIFE

7/3/22 11:27am

All the new additions have to be nervous with that scenario.

LaserCoug

7/3/22 11:28am

IMHO the older schools would have to worry as well. Tradition is gone, money

Nat Gas Man

7/3/22 11:46am

Not really. There are original B12 schools that would likely be left out in that scenario and

ManicBlue

7/3/22 11:47am

3 of the new schools just shelled out huge exit fees. If I were them, I’d be

LaserCoug

7/3/22 11:55am

Maybe the ACC could be convinced to take a couple of the Eastern teams.

Nat Gas Man

7/3/22 11:58am

The exit fees were not really that huge ... $17 million? Cal should be the one holding their breath.

ManicBlue

7/3/22 12:59pm

That would be the best way to compete with the SEC/B1G, but is brutal.

runnincoug

7/3/22 11:29am

The worst part is that no school outside those 2 conferences will ever be able

jazzfan1232

7/3/22 11:31am

One reason the new big 12 might be the safest is that there are no superstars

LaserCoug

7/3/22 11:34am

Reason 1…and it’s all that matters…

TrueBlue67

7/3/22 11:32am

They would take the name of one of the current conferences to avoid that issue

BYU '80

7/3/22 12:00pm

Then it's tough to be able to remove teams from the conference...

krindorr

7/3/22 12:21pm

Exactly. Remember the origins of the MWC…

TrueBlue67

7/3/22 2:33pm

So here's a question (with lots of background, sorry...)

krindorr

7/3/22 2:57pm

I don’t like this option because the PAC members would try to keep us out

runningryan

7/3/22 11:35am

No chance.

CrimsonCardinal

7/3/22 12:57pm

Not as easy done as said.

Needelander

7/3/22 11:43am

The Big 12 does own the name of Big16

Nat Gas Man

7/3/22 11:47am

If you have 16 or 18 teams, only 12 of them are in the "Big" category. It

rockyrd

7/3/22 12:28pm

He is a pac homer and is very desperate. Not happening

travelcoug

7/3/22 11:55am

Who has the tweet with the graph showing the analysis the b12 did to invite byu?

Cougzilla

7/3/22 12:00pm

krindorr

Nat Gas Man

7/3/22 12:10pm

Any chance you could be more specific?

Cougzilla

7/3/22 12:40pm

I'm krindorr

krindorr

7/3/22 12:48pm

I've been reading various Big12 message boards and the general consensus has been

krindorr

7/3/22 12:16pm

Anyone who wants Utah more than ASU doesn’t know about TV markets.

7/3/22 2:20pm

I'd assume fan behavior probably puts extra weight on on-field performance

krindorr

7/3/22 2:25pm

Wouldn't that still just the Big12?

BYULAWGUY

7/3/22 12:38pm

Not Happening.

kahuna

7/3/22 2:24pm

I hope not, but there's certainly a precedent. WAC => MWC.

7/3/22 2:41pm

I'd argue that was more about kicking teams out of 1 conference than about combining parts of 2

krindorr

7/3/22 2:46pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad