Why not both?

Sign up, and you can customize which countdowns you see. Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Jun 3, 2023
5:14:38pm

CSoul Truly Addicted User

Why not both?

Report problem with this ad

CSoul

Previous username: tsm26
Bio page: CSoul
Joined: Nov 20, 2005
Last login: Apr 18, 2024
Total posts: 66,447 (13,809 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

I still see cooking shows where people say to cook salmon to 145. That's insanely overcooked. Wild salmon

CSoul Truly Addicted User

6/3/23 5:10pm

Shoot, many prefer wild salmon not cooked at all!

6/3/23 5:12pm

RE: Shoot, many prefer wild salmon not cooked at all!

byuluvr

6/3/23 5:13pm

Why are you eating salmon when you could be eating brisket?

SJS

6/3/23 5:13pm

Why not both?

CSoul

6/3/23 5:14pm

Because you could be eating twice as much brisket

SJS

6/3/23 5:15pm

I respect your bacon takes, but you’re wrong on brisket vs salmon

SJS

6/3/23 5:17pm

Brisket is better than salmon. I don't think we disagree. I just don't have 12-14 hours all the time.

CSoul

6/3/23 5:20pm

Tri tip is tastier and faster than brisket and barely more expensive

YOHONOMOTO

6/3/23 6:12pm

Preach truth! (From an Alaskan)

6/3/23 5:13pm

I never use the thermometer on fish. It's the easiest meat to judge for me

txblue

6/3/23 5:15pm

Yeah. You don’t need a thermometer. At all.

RalphWiggam

6/3/23 5:16pm

But error on undercooking vs overcooking.

6/3/23 5:18pm

I do because I put it on the smoker and don't want to watch it.

CSoul

6/3/23 5:18pm

Here's my guess... It isn't because that is where it tastes best, rather that is

EEcougar

6/3/23 5:21pm

I have no idea about temperature, but I love salmon and want it fully cooked.

Joe Banks

6/3/23 6:10pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad