Which makes no sense at all.

Sign up, and you'll be able to ignore users whose posts you don't want to see. Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Feb 23, 2015
9:27:23am

Kilgore Trout

Which makes no sense at all.

If RPI isn't reliable for a team's strength, why would it be reliable for a teams' opponents' strengths?

Report problem with this ad

Kilgore Trout

Previous username: kilgore
Bio page: Kilgore Trout
Joined: Jan 3, 2002
Last login: May 27, 2024
Total posts: 12,903 (45 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

Interesting results for BYU with Pomery, Sagarin, and ESPN BPI compared to RPI.

swishh_15

2/23/15 9:18am

someone correct me, but i think the committee is using rpi less and less.

2/23/15 9:19am

I assume they're smart enough to look at all of them and give them the proper

benny1982

2/23/15 9:20am

I was under the impression that they really only used RPI to evaluate your SOS

jrob30

2/23/15 9:23am

Which makes no sense at all.

2/23/15 9:27am

They've said for years a team's RPI doesn't matter nearly as much as

byubyu

2/23/15 9:25am

Yes but they're still using the RPI of the team you beat.

swishh_15

2/23/15 9:26am

It's only one metric they use. The reason it gets talked about so much is

byubyu

2/23/15 9:35am

let me think about that...i'm not sure that makes sense.

2/23/15 9:26am

A team can manufacture a high RPI without hardly playing and beating any good

byubyu

2/23/15 9:34am

okay. that makes sense.

2/23/15 9:35am

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad