I remember, but the sporting world did not use Reddick Range to describe deep 3s

Report problem with this ad

Jul 23, 2014
5:10:04pm

ag4cougs

Report problem with this ad

ag4cougs

Bio page: ag4cougs
Joined: Mar 30, 2005
Last login: May 16, 2024
Total posts: 18,067 (10 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

No matter the career Jimmer has, I can see his story being a 30 for 30.

Traveshamockery

7/22/14 8:38pm

what about an Adam Morrison 30 for 30? College greatness to bust.

Crush4

7/22/14 8:45pm

It's a big list

TNT

7/22/14 8:45pm

Jimmer was more of a phenomenon than Morrison ever was

dchandle15

7/22/14 8:47pm

Morrison v. Reddick was a bigger story than Jimmer.

Shimmy

7/22/14 8:48pm

No, it wasn't, I almost never heard about him as a casual sports fan

dchandle15

7/22/14 9:14pm

There is a thing called confirmation bias. You were also like what, 15 at the

Shimmy

7/22/14 9:50pm

I do know about what confirmation bias is

dchandle15

7/23/14 12:47am

The fact Jimmer was getting name drops on SC during football highlights says

rggee

7/22/14 9:32pm

Does that really say otherwise?

Shimmy

7/22/14 9:53pm

Yes

rggee

7/22/14 9:56pm

Trick question, not it doesn't. It does show that you, and me, and other BYU

Shimmy

7/22/14 9:59pm

it's the argument about Morrison or Redick?

southernfriedcougar

7/22/14 10:05pm

That is all a part of Morrison v. Reddick.

Shimmy

7/22/14 10:14pm

False

TrueAndBlue

7/22/14 10:25pm

One does not "Morrison" something. No such thing as "Reddick" range.

ag4cougs

7/23/14 2:14am

Um, Redick was known for long bombs

southernfriedcougar

7/23/14 9:57am

I remember, but the sporting world did not use Reddick Range to describe deep 3s

ag4cougs

7/23/14 5:10pm

True but Morrison did do it all with diabetes.

Posting on CougarBoard