While it is not canonized doctrine....neither is it doctrine that the coat was

Sign up, and you'll be able to vote in polls. Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Feb 27, 2015
7:27:11am

BYULAWGUY

While it is not canonized doctrine....neither is it doctrine that the coat was

colorful.

http://www.templestudy.com/2008/03/24/josephs-coat-of-many-marks

Report problem with this ad

BYULAWGUY

Bio page: BYULAWGUY
Joined: Nov 16, 2001
Last login: May 2, 2024
Total posts: 15,771 (131 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

What if Joseph's coat was really just black, but each of his brothers saw

2/27/15 7:00am

The real argument may have been over what the colors were!

Busiturtle

2/27/15 7:03am

The coat of many colors was actually

BYULAWGUY

2/27/15 7:04am

Fun speculation

ColoSpgs

2/27/15 7:10am

While it is not canonized doctrine....neither is it doctrine that the coat was

BYULAWGUY

2/27/15 7:27am

It is doctrine that Joseph received the Abrahamic covenant

BYULAWGUY

2/27/15 7:32am

Maybe the coat was just that, a gift from his parents.

Bert609

2/27/15 7:42am

Most Mormon scholars would disagree

BYULAWGUY

2/27/15 8:14am

This is how a superstitious belief in relics starts

ColoSpgs

2/27/15 8:49am

From a non-Mormon. It was a royal, kingly garment

BYULAWGUY

2/27/15 7:41am

I can believe that article, but He didn't claim it was spun

Bert609

2/27/15 7:45am

Nope

Slim

2/27/15 7:23am

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad