Mar 2, 2015
11:08:35pm
11:08:35pm
Out of curiosity, I was reading the Wikipedia page on Roman Numerals recently.
I can't remember what made me look it up, but I was interested in the history. Apparently IV is a more recent adaptation, and IIII was more common in the past. It isn't incorrect, just less commonly used now.
- Bio page
- El Jefe
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2001
- Last login
- May 3, 2024
- Total posts
- 77,170 (25,732 FO)
