I don't think you can say it would "obviously change the outcome of the game"

Report problem with this ad

Oct 6, 2015
12:10:25pm

Metallicat

It may have, but you can't be sure.

This message has been modified

Originally posted on Oct 6, 2015 at 12:10:25pm

Message modified by Metallicat on Oct 6, 2015 at 12:11:21pm

Report problem with this ad

Metallicat

Bio page: Metallicat
Joined: Aug 27, 2011
Last login: Apr 28, 2024
Total posts: 5,623 (1,569 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

"For the integrity of the game"

Accipiter

10/6/15 12:00pm

RE: "For the integrity of the game"

Cougar Insider

10/6/15 12:02pm

Do you really think the NFL is going after the Patriots over

erodcoug

10/6/15 12:03pm

You're hilarious.

Accipiter

10/6/15 12:08pm

Yeah the Patriots have never cheated.

erodcoug

10/6/15 12:15pm

<< Deleted >>

erodcoug

10/6/15 12:19pm

It's arguable the Patriots gained an advantage

Twin Roots

10/6/15 12:04pm

Footballs bounce in funny ways. This doesn't look like it was heading straight

AndyDwyer

10/6/15 12:17pm

RE: "For the integrity of the game"

Byron McNertney

10/6/15 12:09pm

I don't think you can say it would "obviously change the outcome of the game"

Metallicat

10/6/15 12:10pm

Making the call gives Detroit the ball where? Inside the ten?

Accipiter

10/6/15 12:12pm

Inside the 1. Probably nine inches from the endzone.

AndyDwyer

10/6/15 12:15pm

No doubt, but the "outcome" may have still been a Seahawks Win.

Metallicat

10/6/15 12:15pm

BTW, not arguing that the call wasn't a blown call. It was.

Posting on CougarBoard