You say 33 points per game. Then I show you why A. that number is misleading because of defensive touchdowns and 51 v UMass and 55 vs Toledo, and B. Show you that the offense was actually bad for most of those games you were referencing.  You have no point to your 33 ppg argument. It is garbage. There is no substance to it and I showed you why.

Let me break it down for you more simply

1. Good game

2. Offense plays well on the back of JW. 

3. MSU was bad. Yes. You are right they were bad. 

4. When using ppg to evaluate an offense, yes OT points dont count and thats obvious.

5. Defense scores 14 points. Offense has 3 more turnovers to score points ends up with 13 points total. Yes Phchole that is not good any way you want to spin it.

6. Defense plays well. Offense plays poorly. BYU wins. Talking strictly about the offense, they played poorly. 

7. Yes, who cares its SUU. BYU could win that game by 100 and it wouldnt mean one thing. 

8. Yes, UMass was horrible so evaluating the offense on any level is basically impossible. Similar to the SJSU game this year. But if you cant understand that then I am an idiot for even engaging you.

9. The offense scores 21 points vs a very bad Utah State. Not good!

10. Offense scores 24 points 7 of which come from a 3 yard drive against a mediocre Wyoming team. Not Good!

So of the 8 games about which anyone could actually make any meaningful observations the offense played well in 2 and pretty good in 1. That is why your 33 points per game argument is dumb.