My Account
Report problem with this ad
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Sep 30, 2014
3:48
:23
pm
Mikey
Weren't the better teams already rewarded? I don't get it.
Are they saying if a 15 beats a 2, instead of "rewarding" the 15 the 2 spot for the rest of the tournament, they get re-seeded to a worse position? If so, that's just plain idiotic.
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Report problem with this ad
Mikey
Bio page
Mikey
Joined
Jul 12, 2002
Last login
May 22, 2024
Total posts
16,549 (958 FO)
Report problem with this ad
Messages
Author
Time
POLL: For The Tournament the NCAA should re-seed the teams going into the round
BlueK
9/30/14 3:38pm
What's the point of re-seeding?
Mikey
9/30/14 3:42pm
Reward the higher seeded teams.
Walter Bellhaven
9/30/14 3:45pm
Assuming they are better teams. Maybe they aren't. Pro leagues are different
BlueK
9/30/14 3:46pm
Fixed it.
Walter Bellhaven
9/30/14 3:47pm
Weren't the better teams already rewarded? I don't get it.
Mikey
9/30/14 3:48pm
Jay Bilas would love it
BlueK
9/30/14 3:49pm
I guess it just depends on how much of a reward you think the higher seeds
Walter Bellhaven
9/30/14 3:54pm
the concept makes some sense on the surface. It makes more sense in the context
BlueK
9/30/14 3:55pm
that's true if there are no upsets
The Shazad
9/30/14 3:56pm
Report problem with this ad
Posting on CougarBoard
In order to post, you will need to either
sign up
or
log in
.
Report problem with this ad