'for not giving in to our every demand.'

How interesting that unions have very little hesitation to drag a negotiating partner through the mud but expects favorable treatment at the negotiation table.

if the Dnews article is correct (and granted there maybe a slight conflict of interest given who their mutual employers are) then the unions are protesting a 3rd party in the negotiations. I can see why and how that would cause management to feel the pressure but in this case they're slandering someone who isn't even a party to the negotiation! Their sign says BYU, not Okland construction!

I wonder if we're missing part of the story.