I'm not saying that the amounts are incorrect; however, there are different ways to account for how money flows. Looks like they may be calling the money that flows from men's sports (profit) to women's sports (to cover loss) as women's revenue. Maybe I'm wrong, but that was my first thoughts seeing the high women's revenue and the $0 net rev/exp.

Also, when you have $16m in un-allocated funds, I'm not going to put too much into the exact breakouts.