My Account
Sign up, and you'll be able to ignore users whose posts you don't want to see.
Sign up
Report problem with this ad
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Dec 18, 2014
8:16
:01
pm
RebelScum
Which illustrates the fallacy of almost exclusively using the RPI for
seedings. While definitely useful, it does have its inherent weaknesses and biases, and should never be exclusively used.
This message has been modified
Originally posted on Dec 18, 2014 at 8:16:01pm
Message modified by RebelScum on Dec 19, 2014 at 10:06:24pm
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Report problem with this ad
RebelScum
Bio page
RebelScum
Joined
Feb 25, 2010
Last login
Apr 27, 2024
Total posts
12,582 (1,632 FO)
Report problem with this ad
Messages
Author
Time
Anyone know why a 29-4 BYU team wasn't seeded?
Lifi
12/18/14 7:07pm
Probably rpi, not that I agree.
Grit for Brains
12/18/14 7:08pm
Politics, simply Politics.
TheDean
12/18/14 7:08pm
Yeah, not a P5
AF Cougar
12/18/14 7:30pm
The seeding was weighed heavily by RPI and BYU was 17 in RPI.
basman
12/18/14 7:08pm
I thought the lower the RPI the better??? Silly me. LOL
TheDean
12/18/14 7:15pm
Ranked #12 too, but not seeded in the top 16. They were robbed.
jdub
12/18/14 7:08pm
People were saying here a few days ago it's due to their rpi and lack of
Jam Master J
12/18/14 7:10pm
How about 4 of them in a row now.
TheDean
12/18/14 7:15pm
Four 9-loss teams had better RPI
AF Cougar
12/18/14 7:33pm
Which illustrates the fallacy of almost exclusively using the RPI for
RebelScum
12/18/14 8:16pm
Report problem with this ad
Posting on CougarBoard
In order to post, you will need to either
sign up
or
log in
.
Report problem with this ad