Great for TCU is not automatically great for B12

Sign up, and you'll be able to ignore users whose posts you don't want to see. Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Jun 30, 2015
10:57:10am

SouthernBlueBlood

Great for TCU is not automatically great for B12

Report problem with this ad

SouthernBlueBlood

Previous username: RoyalTX
Bio page: SouthernBlueBlood
Joined: Apr 11, 2010
Last login: May 2, 2024
Total posts: 44,056 (5,523 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

POLL: Which conference expansion team turned out to be the best addition thus

Mister P

6/30/15 10:23am

Best on the field or best in terms of adding overall value to the conference?

concolor couguar

6/30/15 10:25am

I'll leave that up to you.

Mister P

6/30/15 10:28am

What, no Utah? no Colorado?

teancum

6/30/15 10:25am

No question it is aTm

mudpupper

6/30/15 10:29am

I'd argue forTCU

boxydutch

6/30/15 10:35am

Dallas market the Big 12 already owned?

wapiti

6/30/15 10:51am

Great for TCU is not automatically great for B12

SouthernBlueBlood

6/30/15 10:57am

RE: Great for TCU is not automatically great for B12

boxydutch

6/30/15 1:17pm

No because then Baylor would have been the team- I don't believe they add a

SouthernBlueBlood

6/30/15 1:32pm

Hard to argue anything but T A&M- huge market big name no downside

SouthernBlueBlood

6/30/15 10:56am

T A&M number 1 to sec. Nebraska 2 to Big 10. 3. Missouri to SEC. 4 TCU to BIG 12

capo

6/30/15 11:57am

1. TAMU - not even close - best market for SEC. TAMU out from under UT's thumb.

jvquarterback

6/30/15 2:19pm

how important do you think those first years with Manziel were??

capo

6/30/15 2:25pm

It was good for TA&M but even if they were so so it was still a great pick

SouthernBlueBlood

6/30/15 2:28pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad