Sign up, and you'll be able to ignore users whose posts you don't want to see. Sign up
Sep 2, 2015
11:40:22am
I'm not really sure why, but two theories:
1) Offering more for the First Counselor than the President was definitely a not-so-subtle shot at John Taylor.

2) Cannon was incredibly important. He had been Utah's delegate to Congress, was a business leader in the community, and had been Brigham's right-hand man for several years prior to Brigham's death. Additionally, Cannon was definitely a powerful personality within the First Presidency and was often the public face of the presidency (similar to President Uchtdorf today; President Hinckley during his many years in the Presidency; and J. Reuben Clark during the 1930s and 1940s). On the other hand, although John Taylor was important as a religious leader and had served in a few civic roles (such as Territorial Superintendent of Schools), he didn't have anywhere near the same political cache outside of Utah as Cannon had. Offering more for Cannon was a statement about the estimation that outsiders had of Cannon, as well as a statement about just how much Cannon mattered to the Church in a religious role.
Still Open
Bio page
Still Open
Joined
Nov 9, 2007
Last login
May 5, 2024
Total posts
32,775 (21,483 FO)
Messages
Author
Time

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.