Jackson - The most athletic of the 3 and has the most upside (hence the offer from Duke). He is very good at going to the hole and has a very good pull up jumper. Great ball handler. He is an above average 3 point shooter. In my opinion does not have the same competitive fire as either of the other two.

Emery - IMO is very similar to Matt Carlino. I know that a lot of people hate this comparison but I didn't hate Carlino, I just think he didn't play withing the system very well. If Emery will play within the system and take better shots than Carlino he will have a very good career at BYU. Great shooter but streaky, good finisher. Great competitor - very similar to his brother in this way. I would say in comparison to his brother he is a better ball handler, much better at creating his own shot, better range on his 3 point shot, not as good of defender (but Jackson was elite).

Haws - Wasn't sold on him early but the more I watched him the more I liked. I don't know how everything will translate at the college level, but if you gave me 1 player to pick at the high school level out of the state of UT in the last 30 years it would be Haws. The kid knows how to win. The best competitor I have ever seen at that level. Much different game than Tyler. Not as good as mid range game (but again Tyler was elite). Much better ball handler then Tyler, more athletic, better defender. I think that Tyler worked harder than almost anyone else. If TJ works as hard I think that he will be a better player than Tyler. He may not score as much but his overall game will be better.