which is utilized by public universities across the state, is unfair because it provides students accused of sexual assault the right to attorneys and to confront their accusers through cross-examination and an evidentiary hearing in front of an administrative law judge."

Somehow that sounds fair to me. I can see having problems with an ALJ hired by the Chancellor. But having a right to a lawyer and cross-examination in an evidentiary hearing seem like reasonable due process and necessary to avoid a legal lynching. What, may I ask, are other universities doing in these cases?