but how do you justify pulling the QB, who's strength is their leadership, when he and his team mates that are battling on the field are literally one play away from winning 2 of the 4 games that were lost, and one play away from tying the WVU game (or a few plays away from winning it outright in regulation if not for the pick).

I have been disappointed in Taysom as well, but to say there is just no justification for the coaches decision is a clear indication of not understanding all that goes into that kind of decision. I am confident they considered it. Kalani mentioned that they considered it at the half of UCLA game. They decided that giving the Sr. the chance to win these games that he has given them a chance to win was the right decision and I can't really argue.

I love Tanner and I have wanted to see him play as well, but it is clearly not so black and white as some on this board want to make it.