Apr 26, 2024
3:58:44pm
3:58:44pm
No, the racial issues went far deeper and longer in LA
There was one juror, a elderly black man who is on record as stating that he was certain OJ was innocent because he trusted Johnnie Cochran to not defend a guilty man.
Cochran is on record stating that he if he can get one black juror there would not be a guilty verdict. Cochran got 8 black jurors. There was no way that OJ would ever be found guilty. There were a lot of problems, issues and failures in the investigation and prosecution but in the end none of it mattered. Cochran had it in the bag from the beginning and he knew it. He could afford to play fast and loose, he knew the outcome.
Cochran is on record stating that he if he can get one black juror there would not be a guilty verdict. Cochran got 8 black jurors. There was no way that OJ would ever be found guilty. There were a lot of problems, issues and failures in the investigation and prosecution but in the end none of it mattered. Cochran had it in the bag from the beginning and he knew it. He could afford to play fast and loose, he knew the outcome.
- Bio page
- Cougrrrs Roll
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2006
- Last login
- May 6, 2024
- Total posts
- 47,230 (2,623 FO)
Messages
Time
I've been watching the OJ Simpson 30 for 30 on Netflix and learned the the shoeprint at the murder scene was from a
Apr 26, 3:12pm
Forgot about that. Who was the Bruno Magli expert that took the stand? I remember a French guy testifying about it.
Apr 26, 3:15pm
Maybe the Bloomingdale's sales guy. It wasn't until after the criminal trial that they found a picture of OJ
Apr 26, 3:16pm
Apr 26, 3:24pm
Apr 26, 3:22pm
Apr 26, 3:30pm
Apr 26, 3:35pm
Apr 26, 5:03pm