Which makes no sense at all.

Sign up, and you can make all message times appear in your timezone. Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Feb 23, 2015
9:27:23am

Kilgore Trout

Which makes no sense at all.

If RPI isn't reliable for a team's strength, why would it be reliable for a teams' opponents' strengths?

Report problem with this ad

Kilgore Trout

Previous username: kilgore
Bio page: Kilgore Trout
Joined: Jan 3, 2002
Last login: Jun 20, 2024
Total posts: 13,022 (45 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

Interesting results for BYU with Pomery, Sagarin, and ESPN BPI compared to RPI.

swishh_15

2/23/15 9:18am

someone correct me, but i think the committee is using rpi less and less.

2/23/15 9:19am

I assume they're smart enough to look at all of them and give them the proper

benny1982

2/23/15 9:20am

I was under the impression that they really only used RPI to evaluate your SOS

jrob30

2/23/15 9:23am

Which makes no sense at all.

2/23/15 9:27am

They've said for years a team's RPI doesn't matter nearly as much as

byubyu

2/23/15 9:25am

Yes but they're still using the RPI of the team you beat.

swishh_15

2/23/15 9:26am

It's only one metric they use. The reason it gets talked about so much is

byubyu

2/23/15 9:35am

let me think about that...i'm not sure that makes sense.

2/23/15 9:26am

A team can manufacture a high RPI without hardly playing and beating any good

byubyu

2/23/15 9:34am

okay. that makes sense.

2/23/15 9:35am

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad