on the wrist.
You insinuated that crimes that don’t result in property damage or injury shouldn’t carry a severe penalty. I suppose the term severe here is subjective, but regardless, what do you feel would be a penalty that fits the crime in Few’s case?
I think what’s missing from your point is that although there was no injury or property damage in this case, there was significant risk of both of those due to his actions, which calls for a penalty.