It's not definitive, so the call had to stand. But a Pac-12 ref conspiracy is

Report problem with this ad

Nov 27, 2022
12:15:30am

garyfan Truly Addicted User

It's not definitive, so the call had to stand. But a Pac-12 ref conspiracy is

more fun.

Report problem with this ad

garyfan

Bio page: garyfan
Joined: Sep 19, 2013
Last login: May 24, 2024
Total posts: 37,780 (3,880 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

So on the one angle from front I thought side of foot hit first. I had no issue

777

11/27/22 12:14am

Side of the foot means the whole foot has to come down in bounds unless it is a tap. it wasn't a tap

shimmy

11/27/22 12:15am

It's not definitive, so the call had to stand. But a Pac-12 ref conspiracy is

garyfan

11/27/22 12:15am

Even the replay rules expert thought it was definitive

The Dark Knight

11/27/22 12:17am

Actually, the expert is wrong because the argument for it being no-catch isn't

garyfan

11/27/22 12:20am

If the whole foot comes down, the whole foot must be in, not just first contact

The Dark Knight

11/27/22 12:15am

Does the ref know that?

777

11/27/22 12:18am

Don't know, frustrating though

The Dark Knight

11/27/22 12:23am

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad