Perhaps, but that is likely years away. And there is enough of them that even if

Report problem with this ad

Jan 31, 2023
3:04:38pm

Gentleman Stan All-American

Perhaps, but that is likely years away. And there is enough of them that even if

3-4 leave they will still have double digit numbers.

The length of their GOR was mocked by some, but it has lent stability to a league that would otherwise have had some members picked off by now.

Certainly, the Pac-12 wishes it had been able to secure such a lengthy GOR.

Report problem with this ad

Gentleman Stan

Previous username: (Private)
Bio page: Gentleman Stan
Joined: Mar 29, 2010
Last login: Jun 7, 2024
Total posts: 17,774 (1,678 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

Other than potential increased revenue, what incentive does a PAC12 team have to

SausageKing

1/31/23 2:21pm

Do you remember the BigEast? The incentive is to not be them.

RyneK

1/31/23 2:22pm

The best of the big east leftovers have finally clawed their way back up.

Kajdin

1/31/23 2:25pm

Yes, but several of them have been left behind.

1/31/23 2:56pm

More will get left behind when the ACC is raided

Nat Gas Man

1/31/23 3:01pm

Perhaps, but that is likely years away. And there is enough of them that even if

1/31/23 3:04pm

They could lose 12 members to Big, SEC and B12. This is going towards a p3

Nat Gas Man

1/31/23 3:06pm

Time will tell. A GOR until 2035-36 gives a ton of time though.

1/31/23 3:17pm

I think they let it ride and then all the schools will want Sec and B10 $$$$.

Nat Gas Man

1/31/23 3:23pm

I was thinking about them the other day. Who is better - old Big East or new Pac

crack

1/31/23 2:25pm

Pac 12 with Oregon and UW but if those 2 leave then it doesn't matter who is

johnnybyu

1/31/23 2:30pm

Revenue is the only reason needed. They have a spending problem.

Mister P

1/31/23 2:23pm

Perhaps fear that Oregon and Washington will eventually bail as well

1/31/23 2:23pm

I have serious doubts that OR will ever have anywhere to go but the B12

Nat Gas Man

1/31/23 2:44pm

You lost me at "Other than potential increased revenue"

Team Chaos

1/31/23 2:23pm

It's potentially A LOT more money. If Washington and Oregon are holding out for unequal distribution, the rest of them

1/31/23 2:24pm

Which would mean not only being at a competitive disadvantage to all other P5

Corn Pop

1/31/23 2:26pm

The Pac _ _ won't get an autobid if they don't have UO and UW.

1/31/23 2:24pm

Yep also if OU and UW go to the big 10, the Big 12 will only take at max 4

johnnybyu

1/31/23 2:26pm

Nobody gets an autobid, it's just the top 6 conference champions

1/31/23 2:29pm

How's this...without UO/UW, PAC8 = AAC/MWC. Is that better?

TrueBlue67

1/31/23 2:32pm

They might lose their A5 status

Nat Gas Man

1/31/23 3:02pm

They will not make the cut to P4.

panacablue

1/31/23 2:26pm

Being in a conference poised to get stronger, rather than one that appears to be

shoganai

1/31/23 2:26pm

All teams besides UofO and UW could potentially be left behind. If or when those

johnnybyu

1/31/23 2:27pm

Long Term Viability is the answer.

SnickSnack

1/31/23 2:31pm

Playoff expansion means your odds of getting a playoff bid could be greater..

Baylorbears11

1/31/23 2:31pm

This is a bit like saying "Why would anyone go hiking, other than to see all the

Socrates Johnson

1/31/23 2:32pm

Put it this way-- other than increased revenue, why would USC and UCLA join the

Socrates Johnson

1/31/23 2:35pm

The amount of revenue Pac12->Big12 /= Pac12->Big10. Huge difference.

SausageKing

1/31/23 3:33pm

Sure but you wanted to ask about reasons "other than revenue" which is and will

Socrates Johnson

2/2/23 12:35pm

If I'm Washington State or Oregon State, I'm trying to jump NOW.

1/31/23 3:02pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad