Skip Bayless's take, and all other "crucify him" takes are frightening to me. We get this small amount of evidence and we jump to insane judgments and conclusions. I despise that we zoom in, slow it down, and then see what we want to see, think of past incidents, and then declare that the kid needs psychiatric help for shoving a coach (Bayless).
You're flying into the stands after saving the ball, your hip smashes into a person, and you expect your protecting arm to not extend out in a shove-like motion? It's not disturbing that people think he may have shoved him on purpose - it is disturbing that people are convinced that he shoved him on purpose. It's not that people aren't giving him the benefit of the doubt, it is that they have no doubt. That scares me. Everyone is so convinced of their position, their politics, their way. I hate it.